Difference Between Fundamental Rights and Directive Principles of State Policy

Fundamental Rights and directive principles of state policy aim at the welfare of the general public,yet they differ from each other in the following ways.

1. Fundamental rights are negative directions backed by the legal force while as directive principles are positive directions for the welfare of the people.

2. Fundamental rights are legally enforceable by the courts while as directive principles have no legal force behind them.

3. Fundamental rights are clear,definite and explained whereas the directive principles are unclear and ambiguous principles.

4. Fundamental rights have been achieved by the people and they are enjoying them while as the directive principles are yet to be achieved by the government.

5. Fundamental rights grant political freedom to the people while as the directive principles are mainly for improving the economic condition of the people.

6. Fundamental rights can be suspended during an emergency except the fundamental right to life and personal liberty while as directive principles can never be suspended.

7. Fundamental rights promote the welfare of the individual and hence are individualistic while as directive principles promote the welfare of the community.

Conclusion:

Above mentioned differences suggest that aims and objectives of both are different but somewhat similar. Fundamental rights are available to the individual while as directive principles are positive instructions to the state, which the state must fulfill. Together both aim at promoting democracy and welfare of the public.